Travel payments glossary

Liability shift

When responsibility for a fraudulent transaction moves from one party to another under scheme rules.

Plain-English definition

A liability shift is the moment under card-scheme rules when responsibility for a fraudulent transaction moves from one party to another. The most common example is the 3D Secure authentication liability shift: a successful 3DS2 authentication moves chargeback liability for fraud-related disputes from the merchant to the issuer. EMV chip-and-PIN at the point of sale moves card-present liability in a similar way.

Why it matters in travel

For travel, liability shifts are one of the few levers that meaningfully reduce chargeback exposure on high-value card-not-present bookings. A robust authentication flow is the difference between defending fraud chargebacks at high cost and not having to defend them at all.

The economics of a single fraud chargeback on a £6,000 booking are unforgiving. Even if representment succeeds, the operational hours spent gathering evidence — supplier confirmation, communication trail, authentication logs, delivery proof — usually outweigh the recovered amount. Multiply that by an exposed quarter and a single hole in the authentication setup becomes a real line in the P&L.

The teams that lean into liability shift treat authentication as a product question, not a compliance one. They invest in flows where the customer experiences a single biometric prompt inside their banking app and is back to checkout in seconds, rather than the older redirect dance that broke conversion. The shift in chargeback liability comes as a side effect of building the better customer experience.

How felloh helps

felloh records the authentication evidence that drives a liability shift alongside the booking, so when a chargeback does land the shift can be invoked with the evidence already in place.

Connect the dots.

See how payments, settlement, refunds and reporting evidence connect around every booking.