Help uncover your inefficiencies, reduce fees, and improve your payment operations.
Get Started

Package Travel Regulations

Are non-refundable deposits allowed under PTR?

There has always been a measure of uncertainty when it comes to the nuances of holiday bookings, particularly under the legal framework of the Package Travel Regulations 2018 (PTR). One of the lingering questions has been whether travel providers are permitted to charge non-refundable deposits.

The Core of PTR

The PTR was designed to protect consumers by setting out the rights and responsibilities of both travellers and organisers of package holidays. A package holiday, as defined under these regulations, generally includes a combination of at least two different types of travel services, such as transport, accommodation, or other tourist services, covering a period of over 24 hours or including an overnight stay.

Non-refundable Deposits: Examining the Legal Standpoint

The question of whether non-refundable deposits are permissible under PTR revolves around the regulation’s focus on transparency and fairness. While the regulations do not expressly forbid non-refundable deposits, they impose certain requirements on organisers.

Article 7 of the PTR mandates organisers to provide complete and clear information before any binding agreement. This includes, but isn't limited to, the total price of the package, inclusive of taxes and all additional charges, along with payment arrangements.

A non-refundable deposit is not inherently unlawful under PTR, provided that the organiser informs the traveller of the non-refundable nature of the deposit in a clear and unambiguous manner before the booking is confirmed. The key is transparency and ensuring that consumers are fully aware of the terms and conditions to which they are agreeing.

The Consumer's Right of Withdrawal

Another pertinent aspect concerns consumers’ right to withdrawal. Under Article 12, customers are entitled to cancel a booking prior to its commencement, albeit potentially subject to cancellation fees as specified in the contract. The regulation details that any cancellation fee must be reasonable and justifiable, factoring in the time remaining until the start of the package and the expected cost savings for the organiser due to the refund of services.

In scenarios where a non-refundable deposit is sizeable or the traveller is forced to cancel, organisers must be able to justify retaining the deposit as a form of compensation for their actual expenses or loss incurred.

The Importance of Transparency

Transparency remains critical. Service providers must communicate, from the outset, any conditions attached to deposits along with the particulars of their non-refundability. An unexpected forfeiture without proper preliminary disclosure might be challenged on grounds of unfair contract terms.

Consumers should have the opportunity to make informed decisions, allowing them to weigh the risks and benefits before committing financially. If this condition is adhered to, non-refundable deposits can legally form part of the contractual terms under PTR.

Conclusion

Non-refundable deposits, when properly handled and transparently communicated, are permissible within the bounds of the Package Travel Regulations. For travellers, understanding these nuances is vital for making informed decisions. Meanwhile, travel organisers must consistently adhere to the principles of transparency and fairness to maintain consumer trust and abide by regulatory standards. Thus, ensuring both industry sustainability and consumer protection.

Join over 400 travel companies making payments simple with Felloh.

We are dedicated to making payments better for the travel industry
Get in touch
Felloh reconciliation illustrationFelloh payment orchestration illustration
Felloh dashboard illustration